Why does the liberal media protect obama

But the tenures of Presidents Bush and Obama have shown us that supposedly conservative outlets routinely failed to challenge profoundly unconservative policies, and that liberal outlets routinely fail to challenge profoundly illiberal policies. Call it tribalism, call it excessive deference to power, call it the capture of the press by the establishment -- just don't try to explain it away by citing liberal or conservative bias.

If only that were it. Skip to content Site Navigation The Atlantic. Popular Latest. The Atlantic Crossword. Sign In Subscribe. I'm beginning to rethink the notion that today's conservatives have it better than The Gipper did. If the elections taught us anything, it's that liberal media bias is alive and well -- and effective. David [Freddoso] is out with a new book on the subject, called: "Spin Masters: How the media ignored the real news and helped reelect Barack Obama. That grappling makes it clear that "liberal media bias" doesn't explain the problem.

It may shade media coverage of individual issues -- religion, gun control, health care -- but it's possible to challenge a sitting president from any number of ideological perspectives. If liberal journalists are failing to be adversarial enough, pointing out that they're liberals isn't a sufficient explanation. At the top, journalists who credulously convey the self-serving narratives of highly placed government officials or ask softball questions in nationally televised interviews are rewarded with better access.

The press always shows more deference to the president in wartime, and the War on Terrorism has afforded successive presidents a way to spend their entire time in office on war footing. Many conservatives are ideologically committed to the proposition that the president should be almost totally unconstrained in the realm of foreign affairs.

As a result, many of Obama's most questionable behavior is ignored by the conservative press -- and it is also ignored by the subset of the "establishment media" that uses partisan conflict to determine what to investigate, rather than making independent judgments about what is important to cover. Relatedly, the particular challenges to Obama's foreign policy that the right has attempted have often been ill-chosen.

Don't expect to read them harping on his violating the War Powers Resolution, a secret kill list, and a war on whistleblowers. In the end, he was more concerned with policy and reluctant to engage in the political battles that make for successful and sustainable policy.

Kamarck Given the sense of emergency at the time and the Democratic control of both houses of Congress, Obama could have used his rather large amount of political capital to authorize and then fight for a larger stimulus package, one which focused intensely on job creation and retention.

But the star economist on his team, Lawrence Summers, disagreed with Romer and argued that the economy could be stabilized using a much smaller stimulus.

Second, instead of focusing relentlessly on jobs, as Romer, most of Congress, and most of the nation wanted, the administration quickly pivoted to its next policy agenda item: health care. They easily took control of the House, picking up sixty-three seats—the biggest midterm election gains for the out party since And from then on, the Obama presidency struggled under a radicalized Republican Party. And so for its remaining six years, the Obama presidency had to confront a Republican Party that was hell-bent on opposing everything he did.

But was such opposition set in stone? That left Republicans to be wooed by a new and charismatic Democratic president—far fewer than what was needed to break gridlock. But a president who would not court members of his own party was not likely to try or to be successful at courting members of the other party, either.

In the summer of , for example, Obama tried to pass a comprehensive cap-and-trade bill to combat climate change. It was replaced by an aggressive strategy of executive actions, from the Clean Power Plan to the Paris climate accords. Obama, for instance, presided over a Justice Department that made meaningful gestures toward reducing incarceration and demanding accountability for police violence.

But these moves can be undone by the current attorney general, Jeff Sessions, leaving Peniel E. As Sarah R. Trump, then, moved beyond the media and his critics to now accuse facts themselves as arrayed against him.

To hear the president tell it, reality has an anti-Trump bias — and his supporters are eating it up. Even when confronted with evidence, particularly from the media, the Trump base refuses to believe the truth, instead choosing to buy into the lie because it makes them feel good.

And one can draw a straight line from the fawning Clinton coverage in the s to the deeply suspicious manner with which George W. Each and every instance where the media engages in bias helped to chip away at the trust they once held; all conservatives ever did was point out the truth.

Now, we all have to live with the consequences to the bias the media rarely acknowledges, and the victim is the truth. IE 11 is not supported.

For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. Share this —. Follow think.